Civil Cases: Sexual Assault: Employment: Summary

🏠
Home
📁
Human Rights Damage Summaries Index
[Sexual Harassment: Civil Cases: Employment: Summary]

Sexual Harassment: Civil Cases: Employment: Summary

 

CaseDetailsAggravatedPunitive
Descending Date OrderOther Claims
McGraw v SouthgateThe defendants acted on unfounded, sexist allegations relating primarily to conduct from years prior, without properly ascertaining the truth and without even asking Ms. McGraw about the allegations. Mr. Milliner conducted an amateurish investigation. He conflated gossip with facts. Without justification, he accepted the allegations and assumed the worst of the fire department’s only two paid staff. He failed to recognize the patent gender-based discrimination directed at Ms. McGraw.$75,000 $60,000
OSC Oct 2021The allegations were fantastical. They were made in a male-dominated environment. The defendants ought to have been highly suspicious that the allegations were based on discrimination. The failure of the defendants to support Ms. McGraw against discrimination was a significant, distressing failure.  $35,000 Human Rights award
Plff was one of the female instructors at the fire college, she was unjustly accused of giving grades for sex.$20,000 defamation
Mr. Milliner, the investigator, misunderstood or misremembered the story told to him by Mr. Sherson, and incorrectly attributed the blame to Ms. McGraw.

Colistro v. Tbaytel; upheld by OCA March 2019; leave to appeal dismissedEmployer chose to proceed with the hiring of an individual whom it knew had previously sexually harassed the plff. This was a blatant disregard for her interests.$100,000

Zando v AliPhysician raped by colleague$175,000 for assault$25,000
Aug 2018
Trial
Apr 2017

Doyle v ZochemCursory investigation of sexual harassment complaint allowed for aggravated damages. Short term disability application wrongfully denied. The company requested employees to “dig up dirt” on plff.$60,000 plus $20,000 as human rights compensatory award
OCAEmployer assured Doyle that her job was not in jeopardy when in fact the decision to terminate had already been made and the termination letter was probably already in the making.
2017Termination due to gender and sexual harassment complaint.

City of Calgary v CUPESexual Harassment;$125,000
Alberta arbitratorUnfair investigation which enhanced plff’s suffering due to lack of action;
Dec 2013Arbitrator was allowed to use common law, human rights and arbitral remedies on consent of the parties

MB v Deluxe WindowsSexual assault;$300,000 assault
OCASerious psychological injuries$25,000
Mar 2012

Corfield v ShawPlff was sexually assaulted nine times;$60,000 assault and future income loss $22,500nil
BC SCDamages for assault and future income loss and publicity of wrongdoing were sufficient to deny punitive damages;\
Oct 2011Presumed lack of financial resources

Elgert v Home HardwareUnfair investigation of sexual harassment allegations;$60,000 damages in defamation against personal defendants$75,000
Alb CATrial award of $300,000 aggravated reversed on appeal and $200,000 punitive reduced to $75,000.
Apr-11

K.T. v VranichSexual assault,General and aggravated damages $125,000$125,000
OSC 2011intentional infliction of mental suffering; breach of fiduciary duty; Occupier's Liability Act;
Breach of obligation of good faith and fair dealing at the time of dismissal
action was undefended

Strong v Kisbee EstateClaim of sexual assault due to rape set by Court of Appeal;$100,000 damages not defined as aggravated
OCA August 2000Trial judge had found a limitation issue and made no provisional assessment.

👤
About the Author:

David Harris — Canadian Employment Law

🔎 Human Rights Damages Summaries Resources

📚

Human Rights Damages Summaries – Index

|
🗂️

Human Rights Summaries Posts (All Posts)

|
🏠

Return to Canadian Employment Law

This page provides general information and is not legal advice. For advice about your situation,
please request a referral to legal counsel.

📅 Updated:

October 11, 2025