O.P.T. and M.P.T v Presteve Foods Ltd. and Pratas | HRTO 2015 | Joint and several liability due to poisoned work environment by deeming statutory provision and also “directing mind”. |
A.B. v Singer Shoes & Paul Singer | HRTO 2018 |
Joint and several liability based on “directing mind”. |
Farris – Divisional Court | Div Ct 2011 |
Div Ct set aside Tribunal decision which had erred in not applying the “directing mind” principle to find personal respondents liable. |
Desousa v Gauthier |
HRTO 2002 |
Personal respondents were directing minds. |
G.M. v X Tattoo Parlour | HRTO 2018 |
Joint and several liability based on “directing mind”. |