BC Case Summary Emotional Harm Awards

  • Post author:
  • Post category:Damage

🏠
Home
📁
Human Rights Damage Summaries Index
[Human Rights Summary: British Columbia: Sexual Harassment Plus Key Cases]

Human Rights Summary: British Columbia: Sexual Harassment Plus Key Cases

descending date order
CaseFacts SummaryCompensatory Awards for Emotional Harm
Gill v. Grammy’s Place Restaurant & Bakery Ltd., 2001 BCHRT 33

B.C. HRT

2001
Sexual harassment$10,000

Senyk v WGN Agency #2

BC HRT 2008
physical and mental disability$35,000

 Harrison v. Nixon Safety Consulting and others (No. 3),

BC HRT December 2008
Sexual Harassment. Verbal sexual harassment, including requests for sex and inappropriate touching.$15,000

Ratzlaff v Marpaul Construction

BC HRT Jan 2010
Sexual Harassment. The respondent forced his way into the applicant’s hotel room.  He grabbed her throat and kissed her aggressively, forcing his tongue into her mouth.  She said that he then grabbed her breasts and tried to get his hands into her vagina.  She kneed him in the thigh but he repeated his conduct.$25,000

Soroka v Dave’s Custom Metal

BC HRt

September 2010
Sexual Harassment. Verbally offensive conduct, without affirmative evidence, medical or otherwise of the impact upon her, a disparity in age between the victim and the offender, yet causing the termination of the complainant’s employment, in part, due to her refusals$5,000

McIntosh v Metro Aluminum Products

Bc HRT February 2011
Sexual harassment. Conduct was demeaning, provocative and aggressive, yet without any physical component.$12,000

MacDonald v. Najafi and another (No. 2)

BC HRT January 2013
Sexual Harassment. The conduct was limited to offensive language, yet insensitive and demeaning and persistent, made to a vulnerable young woman in need of employment, without physical contact.$4,000

PN v FR

BC HRT 2015
Sexual Harassment. Treated in a sexually and emotionally abusive manner.$50,000
A young Filipino mother who was hired as a housekeeper and required to perform sexual acts "at the whim" of her employer;
Forced to leave employment as a nanny; Retaliation by threats of legal proceedings in Hong Kong.

UBC v Kelly B.C. Court of Appeal

BC Court of Appeal 2016
Mental disability$75,000. The award of the tribunal was set aside upon first review and later restored by the BCCA. There was also a significant lost income award
UBC v Kelly was then the high side award. Important that Court of Appeal set aside JR review which described the Tribunal award as "patently unreasonable" on first review

Araniva v RSY

BC HRT May 2019
Sexual Harassment. Verbally sexually abusive, complainant suffered serious consequences, as vulnerable woman$40,000

MP v JS

BC HRT January 2020
Sexual Harassment. Respondent pushed MP onto his bed, put his hands under her clothing, touched her breasts, put his fingers into her vagina, and put her hand on his penis. Loss of employment a factor in assessing damages as applicant refused to continue in employment.$40,000

LL v DM

BC HRT January 2020
DM’s jealousy over LL’s sexual relationships with other men cannot be extricated from her sex. DM$15,000 plus $7,500 for retaliation
imposed employment‐related consequences because that was one place where he had power
over LL when his feelings were hurt in their personal relationship.
Retaliation over complaint by sharing pornographic video of complainant;

Ms. K v. Deep Creek Store

BC HRT November 2021
Jokes of a sexualized nature; asked about sexual activity; offered $2,000 for sex; after rejection of this offer, employer raised performance issues and then terminated applicant. After termination, employer trespassed on applicant's residence, a farm in a remote area, on three occasions.$45,000

Francis v BC Ministry of Justice #5

BC HRT January 2021
Permanent mental illness due to adverse conduct of employer due to race;$176,000 after 20% contingency discount ($220,000 in total prior to discount)
Highest award made to date.

Bayongan v. Shimmura

BC HRT March 2023
Sexual Harassment. Temporary migrant domestic worker. Renewal application was refused by employer.$25,000

Mema v City of Nanaimo

August 2023
Adverse treatment due to race. Complainant was subjected to public ostracization, with incessant leaks and swirling public chatter consistent with the Misconduct Report. He experienced the indignity of not even learning of his suspension directly from the City at first. He experienced a notable decline in his mental health and feelings of self-worth and has lost not only his employment but his standing in his professional community. $50,000

Ms. L. v Clear Pacific Holdings

BC HRT Jan 2024
The complainant was employed as the personal executive assistant to Sydney Hayden. She was sexually assaulted, emotionally abused, physically assaulted and abandoned in a foreign country. She suffered from a drug addiction which the responding party used to his advantage. Her wages were also withheld. The respondents did not defend the case.$100,000

👤
About the Author:

David Harris — Canadian Employment Law

🔎 Human Rights Damages Summaries Resources

📚

Human Rights Damages Summaries – Index

|
🗂️

Human Rights Summaries Posts (All Posts)

|
🏠

Return to Canadian Employment Law

This page provides general information and is not legal advice. For advice about your situation,
please request a referral to legal counsel.

📅 Updated: