🏠
Home ›
📁
Human Rights Damage Summaries Index ›
[Human Rights Damages: Ontario: Reprisal]
Human Rights: Damages Summaries: Ontario: Reprisal
![]() | ||
| Reprisal (General) | ||
| Chan v. Tai Pan Vacations | HRTO | $15,000; |
| Mar-09 | $42,466.79 which represents all wages and benefits the complainant would have received between April 7, 2007 to November 18, less monies received from the respondent at the time of her termination and any monies earned elsewhere during that period, | |
| Smith v Menzies Chrysler | HRTO | $15,000 (also $25,000 for poisoned work environment and 2 separate awards of sexual harassment of $8,000 and $2,000) |
| 2009 | ||
| Morgan v. Herman Miller Canada Inc | HRTO | $15,000 jointly with failure to investigate |
| 2013 | ||
| OHRC v Motsewetsho | OHRT | The $15,000 award to one applicant included a reprisal component. 4 weeks pay in the sums of $1,920 for each of the three relevant complainants |
| 2003 | ||
👤
About the Author:
David Harris — Canadian Employment Law
🔎 Human Rights Damages Summaries Resources
📚
Human Rights Damages Summaries – Index
|
🗂️
Human Rights Summaries Posts (All Posts)
|
🏠
Return to Canadian Employment Law
This page provides general information and is not legal advice. For advice about your situation,
please request a referral to legal counsel.
📅 Updated:
