Negligent Infliction of Mental Distress
As noted above, the Ontario Court of Appeal determined that such a tort claim was not a viable tort. The Sulz case in British Columbia found the employer vicariously responsible…
As noted above, the Ontario Court of Appeal determined that such a tort claim was not a viable tort. The Sulz case in British Columbia found the employer vicariously responsible…
To continue enjoying all the benefits of an authorized user, register now and get the first 14 days of platform usage for free.
I already have an account Sign In