🏠
Home ›
📁
Human Rights Damage Summaries Index ›
[Employer Liability – Human Rights: Chart]
Employer Liability – Human Rights: Chart
| O.P.T. and M.P.T v Presteve Foods Ltd. and Pratas | HRTO 2015 | Joint and several liability due to poisoned work environment by deeming statutory provision and also “directing mind”. |
| A.B. v Singer Shoes & Paul Singer | HRTO | Joint and several liability based on “directing mind”. |
| 2018 | ||
| Farris – Divisional Court | Div Ct | Div Ct set aside Tribunal decision which had erred in not applying the “directing mind” principle to find personal respondents liable. |
| 2011 | ||
| Desousa v Gauthier | HRTO | Personal respondents were directing minds. |
| 2002 | ||
| G.M. v X Tattoo Parlour | HRTO | Joint and several liability based on “directing mind”. |
| 2018 | ||
👤
About the Author:
David Harris — Canadian Employment Law
🔎 Human Rights Damages Summaries Resources
📚
Human Rights Damages Summaries – Index
|
🗂️
Human Rights Summaries Posts (All Posts)
|
🏠
Return to Canadian Employment Law
This page provides general information and is not legal advice. For advice about your situation,
please request a referral to legal counsel.
📅 Updated: